Screenshot of Retraction Watch post:

Reviewing Peer Review

Screenshot of Retraction Watch post: review is thought to be the gold standard for advancing “proven” science, but those who regularly publish and act as peer reviewers know that peer review has its problems. A recent study published in BMJ Open looked at this issue, and was the subject of a post on Retraction Watch. I posted a somewhat lengthy comment which addresses some broader issues that have surfaced in my work with the Elsevier-sponsored Innovation Explorers group.

Reviewing peer review
Article Name
Reviewing peer review
Knowlengr reviews the state of Peer Review. The gold standard that's somewhere between Gold and Fool's Gold.