Reviewing Peer Review

Share this nybbleShare on Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn

Screenshot of Retraction Watch post: review is thought to be the gold standard for advancing “proven” science, but those who regularly publish and act as peer reviewers know that peer review has its problems. A recent study published in BMJ Open looked at this issue, and was the subject of a post on Retraction Watch. I posted a somewhat lengthy comment which addresses some broader issues that have surfaced in my work with the Elsevier-sponsored Innovation Explorers group.

Reviewing peer review
Article Name
Reviewing peer review
Knowlengr reviews the state of Peer Review. The gold standard that's somewhere between Gold and Fool's Gold.
About knowlengr
Read previous post:
Linkedin Stock Price Graph - Yahoo Finance via Google Search 20150430 (screenshot)
Chasing Big Data Variety: Predictive Analytics, Meet Your Market Foe

  The graphic shows the market behavior of LinkedIn's stock price late afternoon of 2015-04-30. Did your analytics engine (What's...