Peer review is thought to be the gold standard for advancing “proven” science, but those who regularly publish and act as peer reviewers know that peer review has its problems. A recent study published in BMJ Open looked at this issue, and was the subject of a post on Retraction Watch. I posted a somewhat lengthy comment which addresses some broader issues that have surfaced in my work with the Elsevier-sponsored Innovation Explorers group.
Summary
Article Name
Reviewing peer review
Description
Knowlengr reviews the state of Peer Review. The gold standard that's somewhere between Gold and Fool's Gold.
Author
Knowlengr
Knowlengr.com
