Knowlengr

  • About
    • CiteULike Snapshot
    • Privacy Policy
  • Sites
  • Blog
    • Privacy & Regulatory
    • Machine intelligence
      • IBM Watson
      • Natural Language Processing
  • Subscribe

Reviewing Peer Review

2015-09-29 By knowlengr

Share this nybbleShare on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin

Screenshot of Retraction Watch post: http://bit.ly/1M0tJO8Peer review is thought to be the gold standard for advancing “proven” science, but those who regularly publish and act as peer reviewers know that peer review has its problems. A recent study published in BMJ Open looked at this issue, and was the subject of a post on Retraction Watch. I posted a somewhat lengthy comment which addresses some broader issues that have surfaced in my work with the Elsevier-sponsored Innovation Explorers group.

Summary
Reviewing peer review
Article Name
Reviewing peer review
Description
Knowlengr reviews the state of Peer Review. The gold standard that's somewhere between Gold and Fool's Gold.
Author
Knowlengr
Knowlengr.com

Filed Under: Knowledge Management Tagged With: big science, intersubjectivity, knowledge management, peer review, reference

About knowlengr

  • About
    • CiteULike Snapshot
    • Privacy Policy
  • Sites
  • Blog
    • Privacy & Regulatory
    • Machine intelligence
      • IBM Watson
      • Natural Language Processing
  • Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Slideshare

Copyright © 2023 • Knowlengr • Hosted by Krypton Brothers LLC • About • Contact