Reviewing Peer Review

Share this nybbleShare on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Screenshot of Retraction Watch post: review is thought to be the gold standard for advancing “proven” science, but those who regularly publish and act as peer reviewers know that peer review has its problems. A recent study published in BMJ Open looked at this issue, and was the subject of a post on Retraction Watch. I posted a somewhat lengthy comment which addresses some broader issues that have surfaced in my work with the Elsevier-sponsored Innovation Explorers group.

About knowlengr

Speak Your Mind


Read previous post:
Linkedin Stock Price Graph - Yahoo Finance via Google Search 20150430 (screenshot)
Chasing Big Data Variety: Predictive Analytics, Meet Your Market Foe

  The graphic shows the market behavior of LinkedIn's stock price late afternoon of 2015-04-30. Did your analytics engine (What's...